Changes between Version 1 and Version 2 of CoopEnergyCons


Ignore:
Timestamp:
Jun 21, 2013, 10:38:38 AM (11 years ago)
Author:
chunter
Comment:

--

Legend:

Unmodified
Added
Removed
Modified
  • CoopEnergyCons

    v1 v2  
    11= Leveraging Physical Layer Cooperation For Energy Conservation =
    2 ''IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology'' - November 2012 (submitted)
     2''IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology'' - 2013 (to appear)
    33
    44Authors: Christopher Hunter, Lin Zhong, Ashutosh Sabharwal
    55
    6 ''This work has been submitted to the IEEE for possible publication. Copyright may be transferred without notice, after which this version may no longer be accessible.''
    7 
    86== Abstract ==
    9 Physical-layer (PHY) cooperation is a technique for achieving MIMO-like performance improvements on small devices that cannot support antenna arrays. Devices in a network transmit on behalf of their neighbors to act as "virtual MIMO" antennas. Since small devices are typically battery constrained, PHY cooperation immediately leads to the following question related to the energy efficiency (bits-per-joule) of devices -- is the performance improvement worth the extra energy costs of transmitting for others? Through an in-depth hardware testbed study, we find that PHY cooperation can improve energy efficiency by as much as 320% or it can reduce energy efficiency by as much as 25% depending upon topology. With this performance gap in mind, we propose the  Distributed Energy-Conserving Cooperation (DECC) protocol. DECC tunes the amount of effort each device dedicates to providing cooperative assistance for others so that the energy spent on cooperation is commensurate with the personal benefits from it. With DECC, users can tune their level of cooperation with completely node-localized decision making. Thus, DECC allows nodes to tap into a large energy efficiency benefit when available and a bounded, preset loss when not available.
     7Physical layer (PHY) cooperation is a technique for achieving MIMO-like performance improvements on small devices that cannot support antenna arrays. Devices in a network transmit on behalf of their neighbors to act as “virtual MIMO” antennas. Since small devices are typically battery constrained, PHY cooperation immediately leads to the following question related to the energy efficiency (bits-per-joule) of devices – is the performance improvement worth the extra energy costs of transmitting for others? Through an in-depth hardware testbed study, we find that PHY cooperation can improve energy efficiency by as much as 320% or it can reduce energy efficiency by as much as 25% depending upon topology. With this performance gap in mind, we propose the Distributed Energy-Conserving Cooperation (DECC) protocol. DECC tunes the amount of effort each device dedicates to providing cooperative assistance for others so that the energy each device spends on cooperation is commensurate with the personal benefits received by that device. With DECC, users can tune their level of cooperation with completely node-localized decision making. Thus, DECC allows nodes to tap into a large energy efficiency benefit, suffering only a bounded, preset loss when this benefit is not available.
    108
    119
    1210== Links ==
    13  * Download [raw-attachment:chunter_TransVT_2012.pdf] (1.2MB PDF)
     11 * Download [raw-attachment:chunter_TVT_2013.pdf] (2.1MB PDF)
    1412
    1513== Citation ==
    1614{{{
    17 @article{hunter2012_energyConsCooperation,
     15@article{hunter2013_energyConsCooperation,
    1816  title={Leveraging Physical Layer Cooperation For Energy Conservation},
    1917  author={Hunter, C. and Zhong, L. and Sabharwal, A.},
    20   journal={submitted to IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology},
    21   year={2012},
    22   month={November},
     18  journal={to appear in IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology},
     19  year={2013},
    2320}
    2421}}}