Changes between Version 2 and Version 3 of OFDMReferenceDesign/Applications/Bridge/Benchmarks/v14
- Timestamp:
- Dec 1, 2009, 4:02:23 PM (14 years ago)
Legend:
- Unmodified
- Added
- Removed
- Modified
-
OFDMReferenceDesign/Applications/Bridge/Benchmarks/v14
v2 v3 1 = OFDM Reference Design v14 - CSMABenchmarks =1 = OFDM Reference Design v14 - noMac Benchmarks = 2 2 3 3 4 4 == Performance Tests == 5 5 6 The tests below use the same payload, MAC and PHY parameters described in the [wiki:OFDMReferenceDesign/Applications/ CSMA#Timing Timing] section of the CSMAapplication documentation.6 The tests below use the same payload, MAC and PHY parameters described in the [wiki:OFDMReferenceDesign/Applications/Bridge#Timing Timing] section of the Bridge application documentation. 7 7 8 8 === Peak Throughput === … … 10 10 '''Methodology''': the tests below are conducted using two WARP Kits (SISO Kit v1), with radios connected via coax cables with 60dB series attenuation. The FPGA boards are each connected via Ethernet to a MacBook laptop. The setup is illustrated below. 11 11 12 [[Image(OFDMReferenceDesign/Applications/ CSMA/Benchmarks/Files:wired_test_setup.png)]]12 [[Image(OFDMReferenceDesign/Applications/Bridge/Benchmarks/Files:wired_test_setup.png)]] 13 13 14 14 This test measures the peak throughput between two PCs connected via the OFDM Reference Design's bridge application. The PCs use the OFDM/noMac link as a wired-wireless bridge, emulating a point-to-point Ethernet link. … … 34 34 '''Methodology''': the tests below are conducted using two WARP Kits (SISO Kit v1), with radios connected via coax cables with 60dB series attenuation. The FPGA boards are connected to a common Ethernet switch, along with a MacBook laptop running the refdes server application and client script. The setup is illustrated below. 35 35 36 [[Image(OFDMReferenceDesign/Applications/ CSMA/Benchmarks/Files:wired_test_setup.png)]]36 [[Image(OFDMReferenceDesign/Applications/Bridge/Benchmarks/Files:ber_test_setup.png)]] 37 37 38 38 The PER is calculated by comparing the number of packets transmitted by node 0 and number packets successfully received by node 1. A packet is successful if it is received with zero errors in its header and payload. Packets received with header or payload errors, or packets which are not detected are counted as errors.