Changes between Version 12 and Version 13 of 802.11/Benchmarks/Throughput

Timestamp:

Oct 10, 2014, 10:59:01 AM (10 years ago)

Author:

murphpo

Comment:

--

802.11/Benchmarks/Throughput

@@ -96 +96 @@
 }}}
 
+=== Observations ===
+* The performance of each PHY rate over an AWGN link lines up with theoretical predictions ![1]
+
+![1] [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1175541 Goodput analysis and link adaptation for IEEE 802.11a wireless LANs] - Daji Qiao; Sunghyun Choi; Shin, K.G.
+
 == Throughput vs. Payload Length ==
 This test measures the achieved throughput of each PHY rate between two WARP v3 nodes running the 802.11 Reference Design. One node acts as AP, the other as a STA. Traffic is generated locally via the LTG framework; measurements are extracted from the nodes via the [wiki:../../wlan_exp experiments framework]. The nodes' RF interfaces are connected via a coax cable and 50dB attenuation.
@@ -108 +113 @@
 
 chart_data = [
+{label:"6 Mbps", data:[[100,1.77],[200,3.01],[300,3.70],[400,4.10],[500,4.40],[600,4.62],[700,4.77],[800,4.91],[900,5.02],[1000,5.09],[1100,5.17],[1200,5.24],[1300,5.28],[1400,5.33],[1500,5.37],]},
+
+{label:"9 Mbps", data:[[100,2.08],[200,3.73],[300,4.77],[400,5.46],[500,5.96],[600,6.34],[700,6.61],[800,6.85],[900,7.04],[1000,7.21],[1100,7.33],[1200,7.45],[1300,7.56],[1400,7.65],[1500,7.73],]},
+
+{label:"12 Mbps", data:[[100,2.36],[200,4.46],[300,5.78],[400,6.70],[500,7.42],[600,7.93],[700,8.34],[800,8.71],[900,8.97],[1000,9.19],[1100,9.43],[1200,9.59],[1300,9.72],[1400,9.89],[1500,9.99],]},
+
+{label:"18 Mbps", data:[[100,2.61],[200,5.20],[300,7.05],[400,8.43],[500,9.53],[600,10.40],[700,11.01],[800,11.57],[900,12.10],[1000,12.53],[1100,12.91],[1200,13.21],[1300,13.51],[1400,13.77],[1500,14.00],]},
+
+{label:"24 Mbps", data:[[100,2.81],[200,5.83],[300,7.99],[400,9.76],[500,11.24],[600,12.29],[700,13.27],[800,14.14],[900,14.74],[1000,15.42],[1100,15.99],[1200,16.37],[1300,16.85],[1400,17.23],[1500,17.48],]},
+
+{label:"36 Mbps", data:[[100,3.00],[200,6.37],[300,9.20],[400,11.45],[500,13.50],[600,15.04],[700,16.35],[800,17.71],[900,18.71],[1000,19.79],[1100,20.59],[1200,21.50],[1300,22.13],[1400,22.83],[1500,23.32],]},
+
+{label:"48 Mbps", data:[[100,3.06],[200,6.74],[300,9.88],[400,12.61],[500,14.99],[600,16.84],[700,18.61],[800,20.31],[900,21.75],[1000,23.13],[1100,24.37],[1200,25.17],[1300,26.23],[1400,27.14],[1500,27.98],]},
+
+{label:"54 Mbps", data:[[100,3.13],[200,6.88],[300,10.04],[400,13.02],[500,15.42],[600,17.58],[700,19.41],[800,21.38],[900,22.87],[1000,24.23],[1100,25.77],[1200,26.81],[1300,27.84],[1400,29.16],[1500,29.88],]},
+
 {points: {show:false}, data:[[0.00,0.00],[100.00,2.24],[200.00,3.27],[300.00,3.84],[400.00,4.22],[500.00,4.50],[600.00,4.68],[700.00,4.84],[800.00,4.96],[900.00,5.05],[1000.00,5.14],[1100.00,5.21],[1200.00,5.26],[1300.00,5.31],[1400.00,5.36],[1500.00,5.39],]},
 {points: {show:false}, data:[[0.00,0.00],[100.00,2.73],[200.00,4.19],[300.00,5.11],[400.00,5.74],[500.00,6.20],[600.00,6.51],[700.00,6.78],[800.00,7.01],[900.00,7.19],[1000.00,7.32],[1100.00,7.45],[1200.00,7.56],[1300.00,7.66],[1400.00,7.75],[1500.00,7.80],]},
@@ -165 +186 @@
 
 === Observations ===
- * The 802.11 Reference Design performance matches the performance predicted by an analysis of the overhead in the 802.11 MAC and PHY [1].
+ * The 802.11 Reference Design performance matches the performance predicted by an analysis of the overhead in the 802.11 MAC and PHY ![1].
 
 
-[1] [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/articleDetails.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1175541 Goodput analysis and link adaptation for IEEE 802.11a wireless LANs] - Daji Qiao; Sunghyun Choi; Shin, K.G.
+![1] <need citation for overhead paper>